Which of the following best describes negligence?

Negligence is fundamentally defined as a breach of duty that leads to harm or injury to another party. This concept is rooted in the idea that individuals have a legal obligation to act in a reasonable manner to avoid causing harm to others. When this duty is breached, and that breach directly results in injury or damage, negligence is established.

In legal terms, the factors necessary to prove negligence include the existence of a duty of care, a breach of that duty, causation (the breach directly causing the harm), and actual damages resulting from the breach. The answer correctly identifies this relationship, emphasizing how a failure to uphold one’s duty can lead to negative consequences for others.

Other options present different legal concepts that do not align with the definition of negligence. For example, an intentional act that causes harm describes intentional torts, which involve a deliberate action rather than a failure to act reasonably. A misunderstanding between parties generally pertains to contract law and does not involve a breach of duty necessary for negligence claims. Lastly, a failure to comply with court orders relates to contempt of court rather than the negligence standard, which focuses on reasonable care and duties owed to others. Thus, the correct answer encapsulates the essential elements of negligence, reinforcing the fundamental principle that liability stems